少女b站激活码2023,动漫内衣办公室,国产色在线

來源丨學位與寫作← 關注Ta

標準的摘要包含五個要素，分別是問題陳述（背景）、動機（本文目的）、研究方法、結果（即發現）和結論（結果是否回答了動機，或者研究意義）。這里分享的《頭疼》雜志上一篇關于該期刊拒稿原因的文章的摘要，按順序介紹了動機、背景、研究方法、結果和結論。原文按五個要素分成了五段，這里的譯文按標準整合成了一段，并將背景放在動機之前，且分屬不同要素的句子使用了不同顏色來區分。

Chelsea?M?Hesterman?,?Christina?L?Szperka?,?Dana?P?Turner?Headache.?2018??Reasons?for?Manuscript?Rejection?After?Peer?Review?From?the?Journal?Headache，Headache.?58(10):1511-1518?

鏈接?https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30011058/

摘要

人們發表過許多以拒稿為題材的社論、評論和研究論文。然而，這些論文很少系統地評估同行評審后被拒絕的原因。沒有一個是專門針對神經病學或頭痛醫學領域的（背景）。本文目的是確定并描述《頭痛》雜志審稿后被拒絕的原因（動機）。我們采用的方法是，對2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日提交的所有頭痛病例進行回顧性分析。對每份手稿的同行評審者和編輯評論進行了評審，并為每份手稿編碼了無限的拒絕理由。拒絕的詳細原因被分為9大類（方法）。我們發現，從2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日，共收到784份意見書。其中，336項立即被拒絕，434項繼續進行同行評審。在此期間，總體拒絕率為62.6%，同行評議后的拒絕率為35.7%。同行評審后拒絕的6個最常見原因是: 方法和研究設計的缺陷、方法的不良報告、不良統計分析、結論的夸大、協變量或結果的問題以及對照組或病例組的問題（結果）。于是，方法和研究設計的缺陷是2014-2016年間《頭痛》雜志同行評審后被拒絕的最常見原因（結論）。

Abstract

Objective:?To identify and characterize the reasons manuscripts are rejected after peer review from the journal Headache.

Background:?Numerous editorials, reviews, and research manuscripts have been published on the topic of manuscript rejection. However, few of these papers evaluate the reasons for rejection after peer review systematically. None are specific to the field of neurology or headache medicine.

Methods:?A retrospective analysis of all submissions to Headache from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016 was performed. Peer reviewer and editor comments for each manuscript were reviewed, and unlimited reasons for rejection were coded for each manuscript. Detailed reasons for rejection were then grouped into 9 broader categories.

Results:?A total of 784 submissions were received from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016. Of those, 336 were immediately rejected and 434 went on to peer review. During this period, the overall rejection rate was 62.6% and the rejection rate after peer review was 35.7%. The 6 most common reasons for rejection after peer review were: flaws in methodology and study design, poor reporting of methodology, poor statistical analysis, overstatement of conclusions, problems with covariates or outcomes, and problems with the control or case group.

Conclusion: Flaws in methodology and study design were the most common reasons for rejection after peer review from Headache between 2014-2016.

原創文章，作者：菜菜歐尼醬，如若轉載，請注明來源華算科技，注明出處：http://www.zzhhcy.com/index.php/2024/01/18/1ff1077c09/

末成年小嫩xb,嫰bbb槡bbbb槡bbbb,免费无人区码卡密,成全高清mv电影免费观看

一篇關于拒稿原因分析的摘要欣賞

末成年小嫩xb,嫰bbb槡bbbb槡bbbb,免费无人区码卡密,成全高清mv电影免费观看

一篇關于拒稿原因分析的摘要欣賞

相關推薦